Comments on: ScrumBut – Part 1 – Timeboxed Iterations

By: ScrumBut (compilação) « JTuii

ScrumBut (compilação) « JTuii — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:07:41 +0000

[...] ScrumBut (Cory Fory) Scrumbut – 04 partes [...]

By: Richard

Richard — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:39:25 +0000

I’m enjoying this series of posts, but it seems implicit that the teams either have had some training in Agile and/or the team is run by someone with very strong Agile experience and coached along the way.

In my current gig, neither is the case.

By: ScrumBut – Part 0 – Introduction « Cory Foy

ScrumBut – Part 0 – Introduction « Cory Foy — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:29:39 +0000

[...] « ScrumButs are the downfall of agile ScrumBut – Part 1 – Timeboxed Iterations » If this post is older than July, 2009 and looks funny (missing tags, source code [...]

By: ScrumBut – Part 2 – Team members sit together « Cory Foy

ScrumBut – Part 2 – Team members sit together « Cory Foy — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 02:35:50 +0000

[...] « ScrumBut – Part 1 – Timeboxed Iterations If this post is older than July, 2009 and looks funny (missing tags, source code formatting, [...]

By: Ted M. Young

Ted M. Young — Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:01:22 +0000

Good posts so far on ScrumBut!

I always try to tell people that the 0th law of Agile is: Inspect and Adapt. Find out _why_ things aren’t working and adapt. For example, I’d want to take a closer look at why work “gets hung up during testing.” Is it that there aren’t enough testers? Too difficult to test? Unclear (or no) acceptance criteria? etc. Maybe testers need to ask that developers (or product owners) to make the stories easier to test.